Trial Sparks Moral Controversy Over Love Doll

Comments · 72 Views

A recent ruling by a South Korean court to allow the importation of life-size sex dolls has reignited a heated debate about their potential social impact.

Importers and supporters argue that sex dolls should be treated like other realistic sex toys on the shelves, while opponents argue that these adult female lovedoll objectify women.

Moral issues with sex dolls

Earlier, the Seoul Administrative Court overturned a January 2020 ruling by Gimpo International Airport Customs banning the importation of real-life sex doll products. Customs claimed the dolls would harm social morality, but the court said the sex toys were for personal use only and would bring benefits. Sex dolls do not provide protection for sex offenders, nor do they corrupt morality.

A controversy over customize sexdoll erupted in South Korea in June 2020, when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of another importer of sex dolls that sued the government's customs agency to block their importation. The Supreme Court said that the government should not interfere in people's private lives, and buying sex dolls was part of that. Customs then allowed the particular company that filed the lawsuit to import, but banned others.
Supporters of the court's decision argued that the dolls were ordinary. Life-size dolls. “A doll is a doll! It's just a way to fulfill people's needs.” - A 39-year-old company employee said. “Personally, I don't understand women who are against love dolls. They think love dolls undermine human dignity.”

In line with this stance, supporters have launched a petition on the Cheong Wa Dae website calling on customs authorities to stop banning the import of these goods. Adult sex dolls and point out that all citizens have the right to privacy and freedom. “Things like realistic human love dolls, which are used in people's private lives, do not cause any harm to others, but the customs' decision not to allow their importation is clearly an unjustified violation of personal happiness,” they wrote.

However, women and feminist groups have expressed concern that some companies offering sex dolls with specific personalities or young faces are undermining women's dignity by promoting the sexual objectification of women. Seo Seung-hee, head of the Korea Cyber Sexual Violence Response Center, said, “Buying realistic life-size love dolls is dangerous because they make users feel like they can buy, sell or control a person's body.”

“The reproduction and arbitrary use of human images inevitably numbs people to violence against women.” Since the 2020 Supreme Court ruling, there have been increasing calls for the government to enact celebrity sex doll laws and regulations. Some lawmakers have proposed bills to penalize the production and sale of suspected child sex dolls, but the South Korean parliament has failed to discuss them.

In her October 2020 article titled “Real Dolls, Pornography of Domination,” Yoon Jiyeon, a professor at the Institute of Body Culture at Konkuk University in South Korea, pointed out that women and men have different levels of control over their lives. Yoon wrote, “Women focus more on physical sensations, while men focus on physical control.”

Social: https://www.youtube.com/@BestRealDoll

Comments